To get a score, each student needs to give a 30-min seminar talk summarizing a selected paper in the field, followed by a 15-min question and answer session.
Students can discuss individually with lecturers to select a paper for presentation.
Grading system
There is no written exam for this course. Instead, each student is graded on the reading of 1 or 2 peer-reviewed research papers and on how they summarize and critique the paper(s) in a 30-minute presentation. Following each 30-minute presentation, there is a 15-minute question and answer (Q&A) session. The goal is to assess the level of understanding. Depending on interest, a curated list of papers, as well as the PDF files, are provided (see Section IX). In most cases, the presentation is based on one paper, but in some cases, there may be two papers.
We will use the CERIC (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning, Implications, Context) system to dissect and understand the papers. This system will be briefly introduced in the first seminar session of the semester.
The possible categories of grades are defined below. In each category, the exact grade will be determined by:
- the clarity of the presentation,
- the skill of the presenter and
- the ability to address questions during the Q&A session.
Both lecturers will award grades and the average will be taken as the final gradeGrading scale
Grades will be awarded on a scale from 1.0 - 5.0, as follows:
- 1.0 or 1.3 (excellent/outstanding)
- 1.7 or 2.0 or 2.3 (clearly above the requirements)
- 2.7 or 3.0 or 3.3 (meets average requirements)
- 3.7 or 4.0 (just good enough to meet the requirements)
- 5.0 (serious shortcomings, does not meet the requirements)
Detailed information about the CERIC system and grading scale descriptions can be found under
Section VIII. Course Assessment at:
Geoscience of Exoplanets Seminars_Course Info_WiSe25-26